Subject:    Lorna Ashworth's Church of England motion supporting the ACNA (Anglican Church in North America) which overwhelmingly passed (for 309, against 69, abstentions 17)

 

Lorna Ashworth's motion on ACNA

Posted on February 12, 2010 
Filed under News

Anglican TV has made available the video of Lorna Ashworth's speech in support of the Anglican Church in North America at the Church of England General Synod.

 

Text of lay Synod member Lorna Ashworth's speech proposing her motion

ACNA Private Members Motion

"That this Synod express the desire that the Church of England be in communion with the Anglican Church of North America"

Good afternoon members of synod and guests

I shared the other night that I once jumped out of an airplane, and that my parachute didn't open all the way. You will have gathered by now that I survived. It's funny how that memory began to resurface as the time for this debate drew closer… but like with that jump… I think I will survive.

I have heard that some are wondering what secret, hidden agenda there is underlying this private members motion. I am sorry to disappoint, but there isn't any. There isn't any hidden agenda and I hope that I can make it as clear as possible as to why I chose to table this motion.

The first reason is this; why not?

Why wouldn't we take this opportunity to stand by and affirm our brothers and sisters in Christ who are seeking to practice, faithfully, historical / biblical Anglicanism (as has been practiced for hundreds of years), who have not diverted from the doctrines, creeds and formularies of the world wide Anglican Communion, who have, like others, been getting on with the mission of the Church.

It would seem obvious at this point to stop and simply ask why the debate? What's the problem if they are just doing what Anglicans do?

Let me put it to you this way. It was half a lifetime ago that I was sitting in a presentation by a visiting speaker at the theological college I was attending in Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada. I was not really paying attention and was a bit distracted. I remember this so well because about a year or so later I read a book called, Knowing God by J.I. Packer and realised that the visiting speaker had been that man. I was gutted. I had missed the opportunity to learn from his humility, godliness and wisdom in person; something I have sought to rectify by reading his books as so many other thousands have also done around the world.

Packer has been an honorary assistant minister for over two decades in the largest Anglican Church in Canada called St Johns Shaughnessy, Vancouver. On February 13 2008 the congregation met and voted 475-11 with 9 abstentions to accept the episcopal oversight of Bishop Donald Harvey.

They and many other churches in Canada and in the United States have sought alternative oversight in order to continue to be historical / biblical Anglicans and in order to remain in communion with the rest of the world wide Anglican communion.

The provinces to which ACNA members once belonged have strayed from the fundamental core teaching of the Anglican church. They have either rejected the uniqueness of Christ, or they have questioned it; the same with Christ's virgin birth, and his physical, literal death and resurrection, as providing the only means of salvation for those outside the Kingdom of God. Scripture is not seen as the authoritative Word of God to His people, and the biblical standard of marriage not upheld.

This unrest in the communion has not been sprung upon us. There have been many meetings of leaders and panels and many statements issued; one of which came on 15th Oct 2003 from Lambeth Palace after a meeting of worldwide church leaders. Quote “actions in New Westminster and in the Episcopal Church (USA) do not express the mind of our Communion as a whole, and these decisions jeopardize our sacramental fellowship with each other.”

Earlier in 2003 the Bishop of Yukon, Terrance Buckle offered alternative oversight to parishes in New Westminster after the diocese with its bishop, Michael Ingham, authorised same sex blessings and showed no signs of honouring the request for moratoria. Bishop Buckle was threatened with disciplinary action if he intervened. Then on Sept 19th, 2003, the Metropoliton of British Columbia, David Crawley, speaking about Bishop Terrance Buckle said, “Many of us are deeply grieved and embarrassed that a bishop, who has sworn an oath to maintain order in the life of the church, is himself the author of disorder.” Surely I cannot be the only one who sees the irony of this statement?

On 28 February 2008, days after the parish vote at St. John's, Dr. Packer together with the other clergy at St. John's were served with a Notice of Presumption of Abandonment of the Exercise of the Ministry under Canon 19 and the notice is based on the following facts:

1. that he has publicly renounced the doctrine and discipline of the Anglican Church of Canada; and
2. that he has sought or intend to seek admission into another religious body outside the Anglican Church of Canada.

More irony.

Many of us fail to see how faithful Anglicans like Dr. Packer have publicly renounced the doctrine of the church? We fail to see how being a practicing Anglican outside the jurisdiction of the ACoC constitutes another religious body?

Could it be that Packer and others like him have become doctrinally delinquent?

On the issue of discipline… Those who would elevate the infringement of order, made to preserve doctrine, to the same level as violations of doctrine itself – are not elevating order but dumbing down doctrine.

The question begins to surface, who is it that is causing division? Those who remain unchanged in their doctrine and practice as Anglicans? Or a small minority within the world wide Anglican Communion who are imposing doctrinal innovation and not allowing space for traditionalists to remain. On 13th July, 2009 in the Washington Times, the Presiding Bishop, Katherine Jefferts Schori is reported as reminding the Church of England that "schism is not a Christian act." I would agree.

The second reason I chose to table this motion is that I would like synod to be able to express its own mind on this subject. The whole point of Private Members Motions is to bring matters of concern to this gathering for discussion and debate.

Most lay members, like myself, have little understanding of the technical ‘ins' and ‘outs' of canon law with its uses or misuses.

But as a lay person, I can see very clearly that there is a problem.

Men & women, clergy and lay had been left uncertain as to where they belonged in the Anglican family.

They now however have come together, with the support of many other Anglican provinces to form ACNA. They once again have a home.

This motion is not about the formal procedures of entering into institutional communion. I am very happy that those processes take their own proper course.

I fully understand that certain aspects of church life are matters for bishops and archbishops. I have no intention of trespassing there. But I would remind synod that this elected body did have a role in the process of entering into communion with:

The Church of North India, the Church of Pakistan and the Church of Bangladesh after consulting the dioceses in 1970-71. In 1994-95, it did the same with regard to the Lutheran Porvoo Churches. In 1974, Synod also sanctioned communion with the Mar Thoma Syrian Church of Malabar.

Synod, this is our opportunity to affirm others who believe what we believe as Anglicans. To affirm that we recognise in them the marks and life of a faithful Anglican church.

In closing: We have been debating mission shaped church and will be discussing fresh expressions of church in our commitment to make the good news of Jesus and His kingdom known.

The Anglican Church in North America, has set itself the goal of planning 1000 churches in 5 years. They have already established 37 new congregations among those who are un-churched in North America. Oh, that our vision would be that great, that detailed and that practical. They have set themselves a bold target.

They might miss it… but let us not stand by as mere observers. Let us offer what we can. Our support as synod for them.

We share the same gospel of the same Lord Jesus, according to the same tradition that has shaped us all.

Thank you Synod

2) Video by Anglican TV of the ACNA Debate at the Church of England Synod

a)  http://www.blip.tv/file/3204661 (Part 1)

b) http://www.blip.tv/file/3205029 (Part 2)

 

3) http://www.anglican-mainstream.net/?p=22914

Anglican Church of North America a member of Anglican family says Church of England General Synod

The General Synod of the Church of England passed the following motion on Wednesday February 10:

 

That this Synod, aware of the distress caused by recent divisions within the Anglican churches of the United States of America and Canada

 

a) recognise and affirm the desire of those who have formed the Anglican Church in North America to remain within the Anglican family

 

b) acknowledge that this aspiration, in respect both of relations with the Church of England and membership of the Anglican Communion, raises issues which the relevant authorities of each need to explore further; and

 

c) invite the Archbishops to report further to the Synod in 2011

 

Votes for 309, against 69, abstentions 17

Press conference http://www.anglicantv.org/content/coe-2010-acna-press-conference

Audio of debate http://www.cofe.anglican.org/news/gsfeb100210pm.html

Lorna Ashworth's opening speech here

ACNA website here

TEC Episcopal News Service Report here

Update: A motion that this Synod

a) express the desire that the Church of England be in communion with the Anglican Church in North America

b) recognise and affirm the desire of those who have formed the Anglican Church in North America to remain within the Anglican family

c) acknowledge that this aspiration, in respect both of relations with the Church of England and membership of the Anglican Communion, raises issues which the relevant authorities of each need to explore further; and

d) invite the Archbishops to report further to the Synod in 2011

which incorporated Lorna Ashworth's amendment was lost by 223 votes to 166 “through the doors” after the electronic voting system failed. The Bishops of Winchester and Chichester spoke and voted in favour of this addition to Lorna Ashworth's motion and the Archbishop of York voted in favour of it.

Two motions to pass to next business and to adjourn the debate were lost.

4) http://www.virtueonline.org/portal/modules/news/article.php?storyid=12081

Posted by David Virtue on 2010/2/11 7:20:00

ACNA Recognized in Spirited Debate by Church of England Synod
Archbishops of Canterbury and York must report back to Synod next year.

By David W. Virtue in London
www.virtueonline.org
2/10/2010

ACNAA spirited debate by the Church of England Synod saw the newly formed Anglican Church in North America recognized by all three houses – bishops, clergy and laity in an overwhelming vote.

The final vote was 309 in favor, 69 against and 17 recorded abstentions(...)